Friday, 22 August 2008

nhs IT

Got views on how IT in the NHS should look in 5 years time? The British Computer Society has been asked by the Conservatives to come up with some suggestions, and individuals can make suggestions via

http://www.healthitpolicyreview.info/

full story at

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/22/bcs_nhs_it_review/

me personally id change the NHS into a state backed medical insurance company that does nothing other than printing cheques to patients when they need treatment, letting the patients take the cheque anywhere they dam well want including abroad or one of the current private providers, sell off all the NHS providers of care, leaving all the providers free market and left decentralised and choosing their own IT at a business unit level, and the crap providers can close as is essential in the free market to ramp up efficiency through competition, don't suppose that will come out of the review

neither will sacking Patricia Hewitt from the board of BT who are screwing up but making lots of money on the current mess in IT at the NHS

neither will avoiding hiring consultancies like PA to do the procurement like the Govt has for the national ID card IT fiasco, do I really have to do a critique to expose how bad this procurement exercise has been?

Oh and there is a fundamental problem with the BCS review, its being led by folk who are primarily medics, they have replaced the piss poor consultants like Richard Granger, they've realised there is a problem talking to the sales dominated leadership of the large IT consultancies, and they've gone straight to medics with a special fucking interest, I tell you what you need some people who have spent their entire working career designing and implementing successful IT on the review not just fucking medics with a few hair brained ideas, and you also need some people who know how its done in the rest of the world having it dominated by Brits is a big mistake

Also I think "we are aware of the benefits to be gained from patient centred records. We believe that such records, appropriately designed, properly implemented, and made available to those providing health and, where feasible, social care would enable the improvement and efficient management of patient and service user outcomes." shows bias, the best solution to medical records is probably the patient carrying around their own health records on a USB stick or similar, suitably encrypted, rather than the Government holding it all centrally or in Fujitsu data centres opps sorry BT or CSC datacentres thesedays, cannot keep track of the suppliers telling the centralist nutters of the NHS to stick it, patient held records also addresses the issues for folk who travel a lot these days including internationally

The BCS is a failing professional organisation where the vast majority of practioners even at the most senior level in their business do not bother to join it, leaving it dominated by academics and wannabe politicians, and medics with a special interest by the looks of it, not a good place to get a sensible review of nhs IT, I repeat you need some people who have spent their entire working career designing and implementing successful IT - some people with substance not the presentional sales element of the business or the political crowd

The Conservatives can make a donation for this free consultancy to a prostate cancer charity of their choice, its better value then they will get out of the BCS

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nice find, NDR

Doesn't look like it's very healthy though as a survey site.

Let's hope they've got lots of other means and methods. Talking face to face - you know, that tried and tested good old fashioned thingie - would work well!

Anonymous said...

Workers in a fully-functional EMR office don't have to hunt and file paperwork, since all patient records are stored digitally and can be quickly retrieved by a doctor in the exam room or an employee at the billing desk.

Anonymous said...

But one thing we're missing here perhaps...digital records, being a far more efficient way to process and store data, theoretically do away with the need for so many service staff.

I wonder how much that has to do with the abysmal track record gvts have in IT? I mean, where would all those redundant workers go...?